Saturday 14 November 2020

PART III - THE SCOTTSBORO BOYS : ABORTED JUSTICE

PART III: INNOCENT OR GUILTY?

(FIND PART II HERE)

On hearing the motion by, Mr. Leibowitz for the Scottsboro boys for a retrial, Judge James Edwin Horton retired to consider the motion and write the judgment.

Now, something happened during the consideration of this Motion. The Judge Horton met Dr. Marvin Lynch, who had been excused from testifying. The meeting had happened in the Court house, gents’ washroom as the Dr. Lynch did not want to be seen having a conversation with the Judge. Dr. Lynch told the judge that as per his personal examination the two women were not raped. That he had informed the prosecution that the alleged rape was a fabrication but they were adamant to press the charges against the Scottsboro boys. And it was because of this he had been excluded as a witness by the Prosecutor.

Judge Hurton became even more concern when considering the application and wondered: why is it that when the Scottsboro boys where engaging in a fight with the white boys there was no evidence to show they were armed with knives or pistol and neither of the white boys thrown out of the train had knife injuries? Where was the head wound inflicted by the pistol as alleged by Victoria Price? Victoria priced was forced to lay down on jagged rocks on the gondola car train and each boy lay on top of her to forcefully penetrate her vagina. Where was the evidence to show a lacerated vagina or bleeding back? Why was the semen in their pubic hair dry and starchy yet it was examined about one hour thirty minutes after the incidence? Why was there no evidence to show that her cloths were spattered with semen and blood? There was no evidence to show blood flowing from her vagina? Why were the white girls when presented to the doctors for examination were neither hysteria or nervous or depressed in spirit after being raped by nine men? Why were the spermatozoa non-motile or dead? Why is the evidence of Victoria Price not being corroborated by any witness given that the rape happen on top of an open train on a sunny day on a slow moving train.

Now Judge Hurton was faced with this concerning questions on one hand.  

On the other hand, Judgeship was an elective position. Judge Hurton had been elected unopposed in the previous election as judge. The election being around the corner, if he set the sentence aside he may lose the election since the masses and his voters will be annoyed and in fact an emissary had been sent to him informing him that if he set the sentence aside it will destroy him politically and he should be sure he shall lose the election. He wondered should he sell his birthright position as a defender and administrator of justice for an elective position.

On 22nd June, 1933, the judge called the court into order. He held four sheets of paper, on it lay the fate of the Scottsboro boys and   the fate of his career as a judge.

On his opening statements he said, “Social order is based on law, and its perpetuity on its fair and impartial administration. Deliberate injustice is more fatal to the one who impose than to the one whom it is imposed. The victim may die quickly and his suffering cease, but teachings of Christianity and the uniform lessons of all history illustrate without exception that its perpetrators not only pay the penalty themselves, but their children through endless generations… the court must be faithful in the exercise of the power which it believes it possesses as it must be careful to abstain from the assumption of those not within its proper sphere” he went on to demonstrate the lack of corroboration in the evidence against the Scottsboro boys.

In conclusion Judge Hurton said, “History, sacred and profane, and the common experience of mankind teach us that women of the character shown in this case are prone for selfish reasons to make false accusations both of rape and of insult upon the slightest provocation for ulterior purposes…. It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the motion be granted; that the verdict of the jury in this case and the judgment of the Court sentencing this defendant to death be set aside and that a new trial be and the same is hereby ordered.”

Judge Hurton firmly believed that the truth will always set you free and that justice had to be done though the heavens fall. When the Judgeship election were held, he was defeated but the truth he stood for kept marching on. In 2017 A statue of Judge Horton, made of bronze, was erected outside a courthouse in Limestone County to immortalize his words during the trial when he said, “So far as the law is concerned it knows neither native nor alien, Jew nor Gentile, neither black nor white. This case is no different from any other. We have only to do our duty without fear or favor.”


The trial was done before another judge before an all-white jury but this time they were found guilty and sentenced to the electric chair. The case was appealed all the way to the Supreme Court for the second time. The ground of appeal to the Supreme Court was that “the jury selection had systematically excluded black members due to racial prejudice.”

In a land mark decision in the case of Norris V. Alabama the Supreme Court held that “the systematic and purposeful exclusion of African-Americans from service on the grand and trial juries denied African-American defendants in the state courts the equal protection of law guaranteed under the due process clause in the constitution”. The conviction was reversed and retrial ordered saving the boys from the Electric Chair.

The Supreme Court judgment in Norris V. Alabama played a great role in having the African-American people on the jury and helped in the civil right movement cases that started a few years later. This judgment acted as a seed of change and sparked civil rights movements.

THE AFTERMATH

The Scottsboro Boys case dragged on for years. It ended tragically with young productive lives of boys who were out to look for brighter days being wrecked and wasted. Some of them were released, others pardon and others run out of prison.

In 2013 the boys were granted posthumous pardons. The Governor of Albama stated, “While we could not take back what happened to the Scottsboro Boys 80 years ago, we found a way to make it right moving forward. The pardons granted to the Scottsboro Boys today are long overdue. The legislation that led to today's pardons was the result of a bipartisan, cooperative effort. I appreciate the Pardons and Parole Board for continuing our progress today and officially granting these pardons. Today, the Scottsboro Boys have finally received justice.”

This shameful case of injustice is not limited to the United States of America; Never underestimate the power of history, it repeats itself anywhere anytime. It repeats itself daily in different forms. For instance in our court rooms; when judges are compromised by corruption, politics, sex, racism, tribalism, economic and cultural factors and justice is aborted and innocent lives suffer. The society is denied the birth of affirmed human rights; this becomes the tragedy of justice.

In life we may find ourselves in any shoe of the Scottsboro story. Maybe as the White Girls, in our effort to save ourselves we accuse others falsely, as Doctors who need to testify the truth, as prosecutors who need to objective and not giving in to mob justice, as Lawyers like Samuel Leibowitz, to be determined to protect the rights and freedoms and fight for what we believe in, and maybe as Scottsboro Boy, in our daily life trying to make a brighter lives for ourselves we find ourselves as victims of circumstances in an unjust and corrupted  system; where you are guilty until proven innocent ; but I hope we or at least our judiciary shall be like Judge James E. Horton that we shall do justice though the heavens fall and even if they fall they shall fall on a just land.

In the words of Howard Zinn I conclude by saying, “Perhaps the most important thing I learned was about democracy, that democracy is not our government, our constitution, our legal structure. Too often they are enemies of democracy. Certainly this was the experience of African-Americans in this country for two hundred years. With the government failing to enforce the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution, black men, women, and children decided to do that on their own. They organized, demonstrated, protested, challenged the law, were beaten, went to prison, some killed—and thereby reached the conscience of the nation and the world. And things changed. That’s when democracy comes alive.” That’s the price we pay for democracy, for justice.


No comments:

Post a Comment